This is long. We know. But it’s crazy important. Project 2025 will change America forever, and not for the better. Trump lied and disavowed knowledge, but has put architects of Project 2025 into key positions of power.

Part 1 – Project 2025’s War on Free Expression: The Push to Criminalize Adult Content and Control Media

The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 blueprint reveals a startling vision for reshaping American media and expression through executive power. While previous conservative administrations have attempted to regulate adult content, Project 2025’s proposals represent an unprecedented expansion of federal power into private communication and expression.

The New Definition of Obscenity

At the heart of the initiative lies a radical redefinition of what constitutes pornography and obscene material. The proposal expands current obscenity laws to encompass not just traditionally adult content, but also LGBTQ+ educational materials, certain romance novels, and even medical textbooks containing anatomical illustrations. This broadened definition would effectively criminalize vast swaths of currently legal content, including materials used in sex education and healthcare settings.

The plan calls for establishing a new enforcement division within the Department of Justice specifically tasked with prosecuting obscenity cases. This unit would have broad authority to investigate not just producers and distributors, but also platforms, internet service providers, and even educational institutions that make such materials available.

Impact on Digital Communications

The blueprint’s approach to digital communications represents a fundamental shift in how America regulates the internet. Internet service providers would face new legal obligations to block access to any content deemed obscene under the expanded definition. This would require unprecedented levels of content monitoring and filtering, effectively ending the current open internet model.

Social media platforms and content hosts would be required to implement strict age verification systems and content filtering mechanisms. The proposal suggests using facial recognition and government ID verification for all users, raising serious privacy concerns. Platforms failing to comply would face not just fines but potential criminal prosecution of their executives.

Educational Institution Impact

Perhaps most concerning is the blueprint’s approach to educational institutions. Libraries and schools would face new restrictions on their collections and curriculum materials. The plan calls for creating a national registry of educators and librarians who provide access to materials deemed inappropriate, with potential inclusion on sex offender registries as a consequence.

Higher education institutions would face particular scrutiny, with federal funding tied to compliance with new content restrictions. This would affect everything from medical education to literature courses, potentially forcing significant curriculum changes at institutions receiving federal funds.

Telecommunications Reform

The proposal includes a complete overhaul of telecommunications regulation, suggesting amendments to Section 230 that would strip liability protections from companies that host or transmit content deemed obscene. This would effectively force telecommunications companies to become content police or face potentially ruinous liability.

Small internet service providers and content platforms would likely struggle to implement the required monitoring systems, potentially leading to industry consolidation around larger players who can afford the compliance costs. This could fundamentally alter the competitive landscape of American telecommunications.

First Amendment Implications

Legal experts have raised serious concerns about the constitutionality of these proposals. The plan’s broad definition of restricted content would likely face immediate court challenges under First Amendment precedents. However, Project 2025 anticipates this, including strategies for appointing judges sympathetic to their interpretation of obscenity laws.

The blueprint suggests using economic pressure through federal contracts and funding to achieve compliance even if direct regulation faces legal challenges. This approach could effectively circumvent some constitutional restrictions by leveraging federal spending power rather than direct regulation.

Impact on Creative Industries

The American creative sector would face significant disruption under these proposals. Film studios, publishing houses, and digital content creators would need to dramatically alter their content standards. The plan suggests creating a new rating system with federal oversight, replacing current industry self-regulation.

Independent creators and small publishers would face particular challenges navigating the new regulatory landscape. The proposed enforcement mechanism includes significant penalties for violations, potentially driving many smaller creators out of the market entirely.

International Implications

The blueprint’s approach to content regulation would have significant international implications. The plan calls for using trade agreements and diplomatic pressure to force similar content restrictions on other countries, potentially affecting global internet governance and content distribution networks.

American companies operating internationally would face complex compliance challenges, potentially forcing them to choose between maintaining access to the U.S. market and continuing operations in countries with different content standards.

This comprehensive assault on free expression represents just one facet of Project 2025’s broader vision for reshaping American society. The proposals would fundamentally alter how Americans access and share information, with particularly severe implications for marginalized communities, educators, and creative professionals. The initiative’s approach to content regulation reveals a broader philosophical shift toward using federal power to enforce specific moral and social views, raising fundamental questions about the future of free expression in America.

Part 2- Project 2025’s Healthcare Revolution: Dismantling Reproductive Rights and Transforming Medical Access

The healthcare components of Project 2025 represent one of its most aggressive and far-reaching elements, with particular focus on dismantling reproductive healthcare access and fundamentally restructuring America’s medical system. The blueprint’s approach to healthcare demonstrates a clear intention to use executive power to bypass legislative gridlock on controversial health policies.

The Assault on Reproductive Healthcare

Central to Project 2025’s healthcare agenda is an unprecedented attack on reproductive rights through executive action. The plan calls for immediately revoking FDA approval of mifepristone, despite its 24-year safety record and widespread use in medical practice. This would effectively end medication abortion access nationwide, regardless of state laws protecting abortion rights.The blueprint goes further by proposing to resurrect and reinterpret the 1873 Comstock Act, treating it as a complete ban on mailing any materials related to abortion or reproductive healthcare. This would criminalize not just medication abortion delivery, but also the mailing of contraceptives, educational materials, and even personal correspondence about reproductive healthcare options.

Restructuring Medical Research

The initiative proposes dramatic changes to how medical research is conducted in America. The National Institutes of Health would face significant restructuring, with new restrictions on what types of research can receive federal funding. Stem cell research would be completely defunded, while fertility research would face new restrictions based on religious criteria.The plan calls for redirecting research priorities toward alternatives to established medical treatments that conflict with religious beliefs. This includes mandating funding for “abortion reversal” studies and requiring investigation of discredited conversion therapy approaches.

Insurance and Coverage Mandates

Project 2025 outlines sweeping changes to healthcare coverage requirements. Insurance companies would gain broad religious exemptions from covering contraception, gender-affirming care, and fertility treatments. The blueprint suggests using federal authority to override state insurance mandates that require coverage of these services.The plan would eliminate requirements for hospitals to provide emergency abortion care, even in life-threatening situations. Catholic healthcare systems, which already control a significant portion of American hospitals, would receive new protections for refusing various types of care.

Prescription Drug Access

Beyond reproductive healthcare, the blueprint proposes significant changes to prescription drug access. The plan calls for reviewing and potentially revoking approval for medications related to gender-affirming care, including those used for purposes unrelated to transition. This could affect millions of patients who use these medications for other conditions.The initiative also suggests new restrictions on prescribing controlled substances through telemedicine, potentially limiting access to mental health care and pain management, particularly in rural areas.

Healthcare Privacy

Project 2025 proposes fundamental changes to medical privacy protections. The plan calls for creating a national database tracking all prescriptions for certain medications, including birth control and hormone treatments. Healthcare providers would be required to report suspected pregnancy terminations to law enforcement, effectively ending medical privacy for reproductive healthcare.

Impact on Medical Education

The blueprint includes significant changes to medical education and training requirements. Medical schools receiving federal funding would face new restrictions on what procedures they can teach. The plan suggests requiring “conscience protections” that would allow medical students to opt out of learning about certain procedures while still receiving certification to practice.

Global Health Impact

The international implications of Project 2025’s healthcare policies are substantial. The plan calls for expanding the “global gag rule” beyond abortion to restrict U.S. funding for any organization providing information about contraception or LGBTQ+ healthcare. This would dramatically affect global health initiatives and potentially destabilize healthcare systems in developing nations.

Healthcare Workforce Changes

The initiative proposes new “conscience protection” regulations that would allow healthcare workers to refuse participation in a broad range of procedures. Unlike current protections, these would extend to administrative staff and even janitorial workers, potentially disrupting basic healthcare operations.These sweeping changes to American healthcare would disproportionately impact vulnerable populations, particularly low-income individuals and those in rural areas. The blueprint’s approach to healthcare reveals a broader strategy of using executive authority to implement religious and ideological preferences in medical practice, potentially creating a multi-tier system where access to basic healthcare depends increasingly on geography and economic status.

Part 3 – Project 2025’s Federal Demolition: The Systematic Dismantling of Government Agencies

Project 2025’s approach to federal governance represents the most ambitious attempt to deconstruct administrative agencies since the New Deal era. The blueprint details a comprehensive strategy to fundamentally alter how the federal government operates, targeting specific agencies for elimination while dramatically reducing the capacity of others.

Department of Homeland Security Dissolution

Perhaps the most surprising element is the planned dismantling of the Department of Homeland Security. The blueprint argues that the post-9/11 consolidation of agencies has created inefficiencies and proposes splitting its components into smaller, more focused agencies. This would affect everything from airport security to disaster response, with FEMA returning to independent agency status and customs enforcement being reorganized under different authority.The plan calls for redistributing DHS’s cybersecurity functions to military control, raising concerns about the militarization of civilian internet security. Immigration enforcement would be dramatically expanded but moved under direct White House oversight, removing current institutional checks and balances.

Department of Education Elimination

The complete elimination of the Department of Education stands as one of Project 2025’s most radical proposals. This would end federal oversight of educational standards, civil rights enforcement in schools, and administration of student loans. The blueprint suggests transitioning these responsibilities to state agencies and private entities, fundamentally altering how American education is funded and regulated.The plan includes immediate cessation of federal student loan programs, affecting millions of current borrowers. Title IX enforcement would be delegated to states, potentially creating a patchwork of different discrimination protections across the country.

EPA Restructuring

While not completely eliminating the Environmental Protection Agency, Project 2025 proposes reducing it to a skeleton crew focused primarily on interstate water disputes. The blueprint calls for transferring most environmental enforcement to states while simultaneously restricting states’ ability to set stricter standards than federal minimums.The plan would eliminate the EPA’s ability to regulate greenhouse gases, remove most clean air enforcement mechanisms, and end federal oversight of hazardous waste disposal. These changes would fundamentally alter environmental protection in America, potentially creating regulatory havens in states with weaker environmental laws.

Labor Department Transformation

The Department of Labor would see its enforcement capabilities dramatically reduced. The blueprint proposes eliminating the department’s ability to investigate wage theft and workplace discrimination, instead creating a mediation-only system heavily favoring employers.OSHA would be stripped of direct enforcement authority, transitioning to an advisory role where workplace safety becomes largely self-regulated by industries. The plan suggests eliminating most workplace safety standards in favor of “performance-based” guidelines.

HUD and Social Services

The Department of Housing and Urban Development would face severe restrictions on its ability to enforce fair housing laws or administer housing assistance. The blueprint suggests transitioning most housing programs to block grants with minimal federal oversight, potentially allowing states to redirect housing assistance funds to other purposes.Social service agencies would see similar restructuring, with most federal oversight eliminated in favor of state control. This includes dramatic changes to food assistance programs and disability services.

Scientific Agencies

Research institutions face particular scrutiny under Project 2025. The National Science Foundation would see its grant-making authority severely restricted, with new political oversight of research funding decisions. Climate research would be defunded across all agencies, while new restrictions would be placed on genetic research and environmental studies.The CDC would lose its ability to issue public health guidance directly to the public, instead requiring all communications to go through political appointees for approval. The blueprint suggests removing the agency’s authority to investigate disease outbreaks without state permission.

Implementation Strategy

The blueprint includes detailed strategies for implementing these changes while minimizing legal challenges and public resistance. This includes using budget reconciliation to eliminate funding, rewriting agency rules to remove enforcement capabilities, and strategic appointment of acting directors committed to agency dissolution.The plan suggests using executive orders to immediately suspend agency operations while longer-term dismantling proceeds through administrative and legislative channels. Career civil servants would face new restrictions on their ability to challenge or slow these changes.

Long-term Implications

These proposed changes would fundamentally alter the relationship between federal government and citizens, eliminating many protections Americans have come to rely on. The blueprint’s approach to federal agencies reveals a broader strategy of reducing government capacity to regulate or protect, potentially creating a governance vacuum that would disproportionately impact vulnerable populations.The systematic dismantling of federal agencies under Project 2025 would represent the most significant change to American governance since the Great Society programs of the 1960s, fundamentally altering how government serves its citizens and potentially creating long-lasting impacts on public safety, environmental protection, and social equity.

Part 4 – Project 2025’s Assault on Civil Rights: Dismantling Decades of Progress

The civil rights components of Project 2025 represent a fundamental reimagining of federal civil rights protections, proposing to eliminate or severely restrict many longstanding protections while creating new frameworks that would dramatically alter how civil rights are understood and enforced in America.

Elimination of DEI Initiatives

The blueprint calls for the immediate termination of all Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs across federal agencies and any institution receiving federal funding. This extends beyond simple program elimination to creating new restrictions preventing private companies with federal contracts from maintaining their own DEI initiatives.Universities would face particular scrutiny, with the plan calling for withholding federal research grants and student loan funding from institutions maintaining any form of diversity programming or race-conscious admissions considerations. The blueprint suggests creating a new federal office specifically tasked with investigating and penalizing institutions that continue diversity efforts under different names.

LGBTQ+ Rights Rollback

Project 2025 proposes unprecedented restrictions on LGBTQ+ rights, starting with a complete reversal of federal recognition of gender identity. The plan would eliminate all federal protections for transgender individuals, including in healthcare, employment, and housing. Schools would be required to enforce strict biological sex-based policies for sports, facilities, and student records.The blueprint suggests using federal funding as leverage to force schools to out LGBTQ+ students to their parents and prohibit any recognition of chosen names or pronouns. Teachers and staff who continue to respect student identity preferences would face disciplinary action.

Religious Exemption Expansion

The initiative proposes dramatically expanding religious exemptions to civil rights laws. Any organization claiming a religious identity would gain broad authority to discriminate in hiring, service provision, and program administration while retaining access to federal funding and contracts.Healthcare providers, educational institutions, and social service agencies would gain new abilities to refuse service based on religious objections, even in emergency situations. The plan suggests creating a new federal office specifically tasked with protecting religious organizations from civil rights complaints.

Voting Rights Restrictions

Project 2025 outlines aggressive new restrictions on voting rights enforcement. The plan would eliminate preclearance requirements for voting changes in jurisdictions with histories of discrimination, while simultaneously creating new federal support for state-level voting restrictions.The blueprint suggests redirecting Justice Department resources from protecting voter access to investigating alleged voter fraud, despite minimal evidence of widespread fraud. New restrictions would be placed on mail-in voting, early voting, and voter registration efforts.

Education Policy Transformation

Beyond diversity program elimination, Project 2025 proposes fundamental changes to education civil rights enforcement. The Office for Civil Rights would see its mandate dramatically restricted, losing authority to investigate most discrimination complaints in schools.The blueprint suggests new restrictions on curriculum content, prohibiting teaching about systemic racism, LGBTQ+ issues, or any content deemed “divisive.” Schools would face federal funding penalties for maintaining ethnic studies programs or teaching accurate historical accounts of racism and discrimination.

Employment Discrimination

The initiative would fundamentally alter how employment discrimination is handled at the federal level. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission would lose its ability to initiate investigations, restricted to only responding to formal complaints with a new higher burden of proof.The plan suggests creating new protections for employers who discriminate based on religious or political beliefs, while simultaneously reducing protections against racial, gender, and disability discrimination. Federal contractors would face new restrictions on their ability to maintain anti-discrimination policies that exceed federal minimums.

Housing Discrimination

Fair housing enforcement would see dramatic changes under Project 2025. The blueprint suggests eliminating disparate impact analysis in housing discrimination cases, requiring direct proof of intentional discrimination for any enforcement action.The plan would end federal oversight of local zoning decisions, potentially allowing communities to maintain exclusionary practices. Housing assistance programs would lose anti-discrimination requirements, allowing providers to refuse service based on various characteristics including family status and source of income.

Impact on Civil Rights Enforcement

These changes would fundamentally alter how civil rights are protected in America, potentially creating a system where discrimination protections vary dramatically by location and community. The blueprint’s approach suggests a broader philosophy of reducing federal protection for marginalized groups while expanding protections for those seeking to discriminate based on religious or ideological grounds.The cumulative effect would likely create a multi-tier system of civil rights, where protection from discrimination depends increasingly on geographic location and economic status. This represents a fundamental shift away from the federal government’s historical role in protecting civil rights, potentially returning America to an era of legally sanctioned discrimination across many sectors of society.

Part 5 – Project 2025’s Economic Vision: Restructuring America’s Financial Foundation

The economic components of Project 2025 represent a radical departure from post-New Deal economic policy, proposing fundamental changes to taxation, social programs, and financial regulations that would reshape America’s economic landscape.

Tax System Overhaul

The cornerstone of Project 2025’s economic agenda is the complete dismantling of the current income tax system in favor of a national consumption tax. This transformation would eliminate progressive taxation, replacing it with a flat tax on purchases that would disproportionately impact lower-income Americans who spend a larger portion of their income on basic necessities.The blueprint proposes eliminating most tax credits and deductions that benefit working families, including the Child Tax Credit and Earned Income Tax Credit. Instead, it suggests new tax advantages for religious institutions and private schools, effectively redirecting public resources toward private entities.

Social Safety Net Dismantling

Medicare and Medicaid would face unprecedented restructuring. The plan calls for converting Medicaid into a block grant program with minimal federal oversight, allowing states to redirect healthcare funding to other purposes. Medicare would transition to a voucher system, with benefits capped and adjusted based on religious and moral criteria.Social Security faces similar dramatic changes, with the blueprint suggesting immediate increases in retirement age and means-testing that would eliminate benefits for many middle-class retirees. The plan proposes allowing private religious organizations to administer portions of Social Security funds.

Labor Market Transformation

Project 2025 outlines aggressive changes to labor regulations. The minimum wage would be effectively eliminated through a series of exemptions and local preemption rules. Worker protections would be dramatically reduced, with new restrictions on union formation and collective bargaining.The blueprint suggests creating a “religious premium pay” system where businesses could offer higher wages to employees who participate in religious activities, while reducing protections against religious discrimination in hiring and promotion.

Housing Finance Reform

The initiative proposes dramatic changes to housing finance, including eliminating most federal backing for mortgages and housing assistance. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would be dismantled, potentially causing significant disruption in the mortgage market and reducing home ownership accessibility.Public housing would transition entirely to private management, with new provisions allowing religious organizations to receive federal funding while maintaining discriminatory housing practices.

Education Financing

The blueprint calls for eliminating federal student loan programs entirely, replacing them with a system of private religious and corporate-sponsored education funding. This would fundamentally alter access to higher education, creating a system where educational opportunities become increasingly tied to religious affiliation or corporate interests.Existing student loan debt would face immediate changes, with the plan suggesting immediate termination of income-based repayment programs and public service loan forgiveness, potentially forcing millions into immediate default.

Banking and Financial Regulation

Project 2025 proposes dismantling most post-2008 financial regulations, eliminating the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and dramatically reducing SEC oversight capabilities. The plan suggests new protections for religious-based financial institutions, allowing them to operate under different rules than traditional banks.The blueprint includes provisions for creating parallel religious banking systems exempt from most federal oversight, potentially fragmenting the American financial system along religious lines.

Small Business and Entrepreneurship

While claiming to support small business, the plan actually shifts resources toward larger corporations and religious institutions. New restrictions on small business loans would require compliance with religious criteria, while larger corporations would gain expanded abilities to absorb smaller competitors without antitrust scrutiny.The blueprint suggests creating “moral enterprise zones” where businesses meeting certain religious criteria would operate under reduced regulatory oversight and receive preferential tax treatment.

Impact on Economic Inequality

These changes would likely accelerate economic inequality, creating a multi-tier economic system where access to financial services, housing, and economic opportunity becomes increasingly tied to religious affiliation and corporate relationships rather than market forces or individual merit.The cumulative effect of these policies would fundamentally alter America’s economic structure, potentially creating unprecedented levels of economic stratification while dismantling many protections that currently support middle and working-class families.

Part 6 – Project 2025’s Security State: Militarizing Immigration and Law Enforcement

Project 2025’s approach to immigration and law enforcement represents an unprecedented expansion of federal police powers, combining aggressive immigration enforcement with dramatic changes to domestic policing. The blueprint outlines a security apparatus that would fundamentally alter the relationship between law enforcement and American communities.

Mass Deportation Infrastructure

The cornerstone of Project 2025’s immigration policy is the creation of a massive deportation infrastructure. The plan calls for constructing large-scale detention facilities across the country, with the capacity to hold millions of undocumented immigrants. These facilities would operate under reduced oversight, with private contractors and state agencies given broad authority over conditions and operations.The blueprint proposes mobilizing state National Guard units for immigration enforcement, effectively militarizing immigration control. This would include using military resources for interior enforcement, not just border operations, fundamentally changing the military’s role in domestic affairs.

Workplace Enforcement

The plan details an aggressive workplace enforcement strategy that goes beyond current I-9 verification requirements. All employers would be required to use enhanced verification systems, with criminal penalties for employers who fail to report suspected undocumented workers. The blueprint suggests creating a new worker classification system that would track immigration status across multiple generations.Small businesses would face particular challenges under these requirements, with new mandatory reporting systems requiring significant investment in compliance infrastructure. The plan suggests making business licenses contingent on immigration enforcement cooperation.

Education and Public Services

Project 2025 proposes dramatic changes to how public services interact with immigration enforcement. Schools would be required to verify immigration status of all students and their families, effectively ending the current practice of providing education regardless of immigration status. Teachers and administrators would face criminal penalties for failing to report undocumented students.Healthcare providers would face similar requirements, with new mandatory reporting requirements for any patient suspected of being undocumented. Emergency rooms would gain expanded authority to refuse care based on immigration status.

Local Law Enforcement Integration

The blueprint calls for mandatory local law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration authorities, effectively ending sanctuary city policies. Local police departments would be required to participate in immigration enforcement or face loss of federal funding and potential criminal charges for department leaders.The plan suggests creating new federal-local task forces focused on immigration enforcement, with local officers given federal immigration enforcement authority. This would fundamentally alter the relationship between local police and immigrant communities.

Technology and Surveillance

Project 2025 proposes expanding surveillance technology for immigration enforcement, including mandatory DNA collection from all immigrants and their relatives. The blueprint suggests creating a national biometric database integrating immigration, criminal justice, and social services data.New surveillance technologies would be deployed in both border and interior enforcement, including expanded use of facial recognition and social media monitoring. The plan suggests requiring social media platforms to actively identify and report suspected undocumented users.

Criminal Justice Changes

The initiative proposes significant changes to criminal justice procedures related to immigration. New mandatory minimum sentences would be established for immigration violations, while constitutional protections would be reduced for non-citizens accused of crimes.The blueprint suggests creating new federal courts specifically for immigration cases, operating under reduced due process requirements. These courts would handle both immigration violations and any criminal charges against non-citizens.

International Enforcement

Project 2025 proposes aggressive international enforcement measures, including economic sanctions against countries that don’t cooperate with U.S. immigration policies. The plan suggests using foreign aid as leverage to force other nations to accept deportees and implement U.S.-approved immigration controls.The blueprint includes provisions for conducting immigration enforcement operations in other countries, potentially violating international law and sovereignty norms.

Impact on Communities

These changes would fundamentally alter daily life in many American communities, creating an environment of constant surveillance and enforcement. The plan’s approach would likely lead to increased racial profiling and community tension, while potentially damaging local economies that rely on immigrant labor.The cumulative effect would be the creation of a massive new security apparatus focused on immigration enforcement, fundamentally changing how American communities function and potentially creating lasting damage to social cohesion and economic stability.

Part 7 – Project 2025’s Environmental Agenda: Dismantling Climate Protection and Environmental Safeguards

Project 2025’s environmental proposals represent the most aggressive rollback of environmental protections since the creation of the EPA. The blueprint outlines a comprehensive strategy to fundamentally alter how America approaches environmental protection, climate change, and natural resource management.

Climate Policy Elimination

The cornerstone of the environmental agenda is the complete dismantling of federal climate change initiatives. The plan calls for immediate withdrawal from all international climate agreements, including the Paris Accord, and elimination of all federal funding for climate research. Scientists working on climate-related projects would face reassignment or termination.The blueprint proposes rewriting how federal agencies calculate the social cost of carbon, effectively eliminating climate considerations from federal decision-making. This would impact everything from infrastructure planning to energy development, potentially locking in decades of high-emission development.

Energy Sector Transformation

Project 2025 outlines aggressive support for fossil fuel development while dismantling renewable energy initiatives. The plan calls for opening all federal lands to oil and gas exploration, including national parks and monuments. New restrictions would be placed on renewable energy development, including mandatory studies of bird impacts for wind projects while eliminating similar requirements for oil development.The blueprint suggests creating new subsidies for coal power plants while eliminating support for solar and wind projects. Nuclear power would face new restrictions focused on waste storage, effectively making new nuclear development impossible.

Water Protection Rollback

The initiative proposes dramatic changes to water protection, effectively eliminating federal oversight of many waterways. The Clean Water Act’s jurisdiction would be severely restricted, removing protection from wetlands and seasonal streams. States would be prohibited from implementing stricter water protection standards than federal minimums.The blueprint suggests transferring water quality monitoring to industry self-regulation, eliminating most federal enforcement capabilities. New exemptions would allow agricultural and industrial discharge without permits.

Public Lands Management

Project 2025 proposes fundamental changes to public lands management, suggesting transfer of significant federal lands to state control or private ownership. National monuments created since 1996 would face automatic review for reduction or elimination. New mining and drilling would be prioritized over conservation or recreation.The plan calls for eliminating the “multiple use” mandate for public lands, replacing it with a priority system favoring resource extraction. Wildlife protection would be severely restricted, with endangered species protection limited to only the most critical cases.

Air Quality Standards

The blueprint suggests dramatic changes to air quality regulation, eliminating most federal enforcement capabilities while preventing states from implementing stricter standards. New industrial facilities would face reduced emissions requirements, while existing facilities would gain broad exemptions from current standards.The plan proposes eliminating federal oversight of vehicle emissions, preventing California and other states from maintaining stricter standards. This would effectively end the push for electric vehicle adoption and improved fuel efficiency.

Chemical Safety and Regulation

Project 2025 outlines significant changes to chemical regulation, eliminating most restrictions on new chemical deployment while reducing testing requirements. The toxic substances control act would be effectively gutted, with new chemicals gaining automatic approval unless specifically proven dangerous.The blueprint suggests transferring chemical safety oversight to industry groups, eliminating most federal research into chemical health impacts. States would be prevented from implementing stricter chemical safety standards.

Environmental Justice

The initiative proposes eliminating all environmental justice programs and considerations from federal decision-making. New projects would no longer require analysis of impacts on vulnerable communities, while existing environmental justice complaints would be dismissed.The plan suggests creating new barriers to environmental justice litigation, making it nearly impossible for communities to challenge polluting facilities or hazardous waste sites.

Scientific Research

Project 2025 proposes fundamental changes to environmental research, eliminating most federal funding for environmental science while creating new requirements for industry-funded studies. Government scientists would face new restrictions on publishing or sharing research results that might support environmental regulation.The blueprint suggests creating a new oversight board dominated by industry representatives to review all federal environmental research, effectively giving polluting industries veto power over scientific studies.These changes would fundamentally alter America’s approach to environmental protection, potentially creating lasting damage to public health and environmental quality. The blueprint’s approach suggests a broader philosophy of prioritizing short-term economic gains over long-term environmental sustainability, with particularly severe implications for vulnerable communities and future generations.

Part 8 – Project 2025’s Digital Control: Reshaping America’s Technology Landscape

Project 2025’s technology agenda represents a comprehensive attempt to reshape how Americans interact with digital platforms and media, with particular focus on content control and platform regulation.

Social Media Control

The blueprint outlines aggressive measures to control social media platforms, including an immediate ban of TikTok that appears increasingly likely. With over 170 million American users affected, the platform faces a January 19, 2025 deadline to either sell to a non-Chinese owner or cease operations in the US.

Content Regulation

Project 2025 proposes dramatic changes to how online content is regulated. The plan calls for:

• Banning specific words and phrases from government documents, including terms like “diversity,” “gender,” and “reproductive health”1
• Transforming government-funded media into propaganda outlets or shutting them down entirely
• Defunding the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, affecting NPR and PBS

Section 230 Reform

The initiative proposes fundamental changes to Section 230 protections, suggesting platforms should lose liability protection if they moderate certain types of political content. Large platforms would face new transparency requirements about algorithm changes and decisions to block or demonetize users.

Media Control

Project 2025 suggests dramatic changes to federally supported media outlets:

• Gutting editorial independence of the US Agency for Global Media
• Potentially eliminating Voice of America and Radio Free Asia
• Dismantling the Open Technology Fund, which fights digital surveillance and censorship

Internet Governance

The blueprint outlines significant changes to internet regulation:

• New restrictions on content moderation
• Consumer empowerment through user-selected content filters
• Mandatory contributions from tech companies to the Universal Service Fund

Cybersecurity Changes

The plan calls for dramatic changes to cybersecurity oversight:

• Dismissing the entire CISA Cybersecurity Advisory Committee
• Terminating certain NSA and FBI activities related to election interference
• Shifting cybersecurity responsibilities to military control6

These changes would fundamentally alter how Americans interact with technology and access information, potentially creating unprecedented levels of government control over digital spaces while paradoxically reducing oversight of certain types of harmful content