The concept of preserving America’s natural beauty for public enjoyment dates back to the 19th century, driven by a growing appreciation for the nation’s wilderness. Artist George Catlin, witnessing the westward expansion in 1832, first proposed the idea of a “nation’s park” to protect both wildlife and Indigenous civilizations. This vision slowly gained traction as artists, authors, and scientists captured the unique grandeur of the American West, sparking a desire to protect these landscapes from exploitation.
The Birth of an Idea
In 1864, President Abraham Lincoln signed the Yosemite Land Act, a pivotal moment in conservation history. This act transferred Yosemite Valley and the Mariposa Big Tree Grove to California, stipulating that the land be “used and preserved for the benefit of mankind”. This marked a shift toward recognizing the intrinsic value of natural spaces and the government’s role in protecting them.
Yellowstone: A National Park is Born
The establishment of Yellowstone National Park in 1872 marked a monumental step, not only for the U.S. but for the world. President Ulysses S. Grant designated 2.2 million acres of land in Montana and Wyoming as “a public park or pleasuring-ground for the benefit and enjoyment of the people”. Yellowstone became the first national park in the world, setting a precedent for conservation efforts globally. The responsibility for managing Yellowstone fell to the Secretary of the Interior, underscoring the federal government’s commitment to preserving its natural wonders.
The National Park Service is Created
Despite these early initiatives, the management of federal parklands remained fragmented across various agencies. Recognizing the need for unified oversight, business magnate and conservationist Stephen Mather, with the help of journalist Robert Sterling Yard, led a publicity campaign that highlighted the educational, inspirational, and recreational value of national parks. This campaign culminated in the creation of the National Park Service (NPS) on August 25, 1916, when President Woodrow Wilson signed the National Park Service Organic Act. This act charged the agency with conserving “the scenery and the natural and historic objects and wildlife therein” while ensuring their enjoyment for future generations.
Under the leadership of its first director, Stephen Mather, the NPS began to consolidate and manage the growing number of national parks and monuments. In 1933, President Franklin D. Roosevelt further expanded the NPS’s responsibilities by transferring national monuments, military parks, cemeteries, and other historical sites under its management. This reorganization solidified the NPS as the primary federal agency for preserving and interpreting the nation’s natural and cultural heritage.
Challenges and Transformations
Following World War II, the surge in park visitation placed immense strain on park facilities. To address this challenge, Director Conrad Wirth launched “Mission 66” in 1952, a ten-year initiative to upgrade and expand park infrastructure. As the NPS celebrated its 50th anniversary in 1966, the focus shifted towards enhancing public accessibility, leading to the creation of National Lakeshores and National Recreation Areas.
Today, the National Park System encompasses 430 natural, historical, and recreational properties. These sites are managed by the National Park Service, whose mission is to preserve these resources while providing opportunities for public enjoyment and education.
The Threat of Defunding and Privatization
In recent years, the National Park System has faced significant challenges, particularly concerning funding and potential privatization. Proposed budget cuts and policy changes have raised concerns about the future of these treasured landscapes.
The Trump administration, for instance, proposed substantial cuts to the National Park Service budget, potentially jeopardizing park operations, maintenance, and resource protection. These cuts, totaling $587 million (17 percent), threatened to undermine the NPS’s ability to fulfill its mission.
Moreover, there have been concerns about the increasing privatization of park services, with private companies taking over operations that were previously managed by NPS staff. This shift raises questions about accountability, accessibility, and the long-term preservation of park resources.
Project 2025: A Roadmap to Undermining Conservation
Adding to these concerns is “Project 2025,” a policy blueprint from the Heritage Foundation that outlines a conservative vision for the federal government. This project proposes several measures that could significantly weaken environmental protections and undermine the National Park System.
Key proposals include:
- Gutting the Endangered Species Act (ESA): This would weaken protections for threatened and endangered species, potentially impacting wildlife within national parks.
- Repealing the Antiquities Act: This would strip the president of the authority to protect public lands and waters as national monuments, limiting the ability to preserve important natural and cultural sites.
- Weakening the Clean Air Act: This would undermine efforts to reduce air pollution, impacting air quality in and around national parks.
- Limiting community involvement in environmental decisions: This would reduce public input on projects impacting national parks and surrounding areas.
These proposals, coupled with the potential for budget cuts and increased privatization, pose a serious threat to the integrity and long-term sustainability of the National Park System.
The Human Cost: Understaffing and Diminished Services
The consequences of these policies are already being felt within the National Park System. Recent reports indicate that seasonal workers, who play a crucial role in park operations, have had their job offers rescinded, leaving parks critically understaffed. This reduction in staff could lead to diminished visitor services, reduced maintenance, and slower response times to emergencies.
The loss of these essential employees, who often outnumber permanent staff in larger parks, raises concerns about the ability of the NPS to effectively manage and protect these treasured landscapes.
A Call to Action
The National Park System represents a unique legacy—a commitment to preserving America’s natural and cultural heritage for future generations. However, this legacy is now at risk. Proposed budget cuts, policy changes, and the increasing threat of privatization could undermine the very foundations of the National Park System.
It is crucial for citizens, policymakers, and conservation organizations to recognize the importance of these parks and advocate for their protection. By opposing harmful policies, supporting adequate funding, and promoting responsible management practices, we can ensure that the National Park System remains a source of inspiration, recreation, and education for generations to come.
Citations:
[1] https://www.britannica.com/topic/National-Park-Service
[2] https://kids.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/history-of-the-national-parks
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Park_Service
[4] https://earthjustice.org/article/what-project-2025-would-do-to-the-environment-and-how-we-will-respond
[5] https://www.npca.org/articles/2457-president-trump-s-proposed-budget-cuts-target-national-parks
[6] https://www.nps.gov/subjects/infrastructure/legacy-restoration-fund.htm
[7] https://visitusaparks.com/history-national-parks/
[8] https://www.nps.gov/articles/npshistory-origins.htm
[9] https://www.nationalparkstraveler.org/2024/11/collision-course-national-parks-project-25-and-president-trump
[10] https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-01-30/national-parks-on-chopping-block-as-trump-cuts-federal-jobs
[11] https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/conservation-groups-say-project-2025-would-gut-wildlife-and-public-land-protections
[12] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_National_Park_Service
[13] https://www.nps.gov/articles/quick-nps-history.htm
[14] https://www.outsideonline.com/outdoor-adventure/environment/donald-trump-public-lands/
[15] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipUdTv_fHgM
[16] https://www.pbs.org/kenburns/the-national-parks/timeline
[17] https://vadogwood.com/2023/07/24/the-history-behind-all-63-national-parks-in-the-us/
[18] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BL4jXLj4N-Y
[19] https://onetreeplanted.org/blogs/stories/history-of-national-parks
[20] https://www.loc.gov/collections/national-parks-maps/articles-and-essays/brief-history-of-the-national-parks/
[21] https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/hisnps/npshistory/timeline_annotated.htm
[22] https://npshistory.com/publications/brief_history/index.htm
[23] https://www.reuters.com/world/us/billions-dollars-us-projects-remain-frozen-by-trump-managers-advocates-say-2025-02-06/
[24] https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2024-10-11/2024-election-trump-harris-environmental-divide
[25] https://www.npr.org/2025/02/14/nx-s1-5287971/trump-emergencies-tariffs-energy
[26] https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-16.pdf
[27] https://www.npca.org/articles/6614-five-ways-president-trump-s-executive-orders-could-harm-national-parks
[28] https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/case-you-missed-it-president-trumps-conservation-legacy-rebuilding-our-national-parks
[29] https://www.doi.gov/gaoa-project-data
[30] https://www.americanprogress.org/article/disappearing-parks-how-project-2025-would-decrease-protections-for-nature/
[31] https://news.mongabay.com/2025/02/across-the-world-conservation-projects-reel-after-abrupt-us-funding-cuts/
[32] https://ww2.aip.org/fyi/project-2025-outlines-possible-future-for-science-agencies
[33] https://www.reddit.com/r/nationalparks/comments/1e5vlgw/anyone_worried_about_our_parks_under_project_2025/
[34] https://www.americanprogress.org/article/project-2025-seeks-to-repeal-one-of-americas-greatest-conservation-tools/
[35] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/national-parks-privatization-role-park-rangers-robert-casey-f8noc
[36] https://www.nationalparkstraveler.org/2024/12/last-remaining-piece-unprotected-land-grand-teton-national-park-acquired-interior
[37] https://www.blueridgeoutdoors.com/environment/the-privatization-of-your-public-lands/
[38] https://wessiler.substack.com/p/house-gop-sets-stage-for-public-lands
[39] https://www.nationalgeographic.com/travel/article/privatization-coming-to-national-parks-what-does-that-mean
[40] https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/experience/national-parks/2024/11/08/wyoming-selling-land-kelly-parcel-grand-teton-national-park/76128589007/
[41] https://www.nps.gov/articles/park-concessions-historic-privatization.htm
[42] https://www.americanprogress.org/article/8-ways-special-interests-are-asking-president-elect-trump-to-sell-out-u-s-public-lands/
[43] https://olmsted.org/privatization-of-our-parks-is-a-real-danger/
[44] https://www.trcp.org/2023/01/24/congress-put-public-land-sales-back-table/
[45] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/complexities-national-park-privatization-robert-casey-zbzsc
[46] https://www.reddit.com/r/hiking/comments/1dpd8ku/project_2025_author_aims_to_sell_off_us_public/
[47] https://www.npca.org/articles/6581-the-irreplaceable-value-of-national-park-service-staff
[48] https://www.wsj.com/lifestyle/travel/trump-policy-national-park-trip-vacation-a60ca19d
[49] https://www.npca.org/articles/6680-how-the-new-administration-s-actions-will-affect-national-parks
[50] https://www.eenews.net/articles/feds-awake-to-mass-firings/
[51] https://www.nationalparkstraveler.org/2025/02/update-national-park-service-facing-shakeup-could-diminish-services
[52] https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/5145945-interior-department-fires-probationary-employees/
[53] https://www.thestreet.com/travel/national-parks-trump-hiring-freeze
[54] https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/trump-administration-starts-firing-energy-department-forest-service-and/
[55] https://www.hirono.senate.gov/news/press-releases/hirono-colleagues-sound-the-alarm-over-national-park-staffing-shortages-due-to-trumps-hiring-freeze
[56] https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2025/02/14/national-park-service-probationary-employees-fired-hired/
[57] https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-doge-layoffs-probationary-employees-2025-2
[58] https://www.newamericanjournal.net/2024/09/shenandoah-national-park-to-privatize-campgrounds-with-no-opportunity-for-public-comment/
[59] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/wyoming-governor-sale-of-state-land-grand-teton-national-park/
[60] https://news.mongabay.com/2016/02/can-privatization-save-parks/
[61] https://emeraldreview.com/2022/10/to-privatize-or-not-to-privatize-the-future-of-national-parks/
[62] https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2024-11-07/wyoming-moves-ahead-with-selling-land-in-grand-teton-national-park-to-federal-government-for-100m
[63] https://reason.com/2024/11/14/abolish-the-national-park-service/
[64] https://blueribboncoalition.org/oppose-the-sell-off-of-our-public-lands-and-national-parks-to-wall-street/
[65] https://www.wildernesscommittee.org/news/case-against-parks-privatization
[66] https://ftw.usatoday.com/2025/02/national-park-service-layoffs-potentially-devastating-results
[67] https://www.npca.org/articles/6812-relief-of-national-park-seasonal-hiring-overshadowed-by-reckless-staff-cuts
[68] https://economictimes.com/news/international/us/donald-trumps-second-term-national-park-service-to-cut-1000-jobs-amid-hiring-freeze-all-you-need-to-know/articleshow/118258663.cms
[69] https://protectnps.org/national-parks-at-risk-the-impact-of-federal-job-cuts/
[70] https://www.nationalparkstraveler.org/2025/02/one-thousand-national-park-service-staff-fired-seasonal-hiring-resuming
[71] https://skift.com/2025/02/07/americas-national-parks-may-face-summer-worker-shortage/
[72] https://peer.org/national-parks-seasonal-staff-shortfalls/
[73] https://www.nationalparkstraveler.org/2025/02/update-one-thousand-national-park-service-staff-fired-seasonal-hiring-resuming
